{"created":"2023-06-20T13:24:17.842819+00:00","id":5715,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"14a893ee-9975-43e7-b743-ba27c3e7686b"},"_deposit":{"created_by":24,"id":"5715","owners":[24],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"5715"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:ir.soken.ac.jp:00005715","sets":["28:43:502"]},"author_link":["10369","10367","10368"],"item_10002_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2018-03-31","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"14","bibliographicPageEnd":"68","bibliographicPageStart":"47","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"総研大文化科学研究"},{"bibliographic_title":"Sokendai review of cultural and social studies","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_10002_creator_23":{"attribute_name":"フリガナ","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"ソン, チー","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_10002_description_19":{"attribute_name":"フォーマット","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"application/pdf","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_10002_description_5":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"松宮観山は江戸期に神儒仏三教思想を論じた一人である。彼は、兵学、儒学、測量学、易学、和歌、唐音などの複数の分野に精通していた思想家で、『三教要論』、『続三教要論』などの自著において、神儒仏三教思想を唱えた。本論文は、松宮観山の思想における「道」と「教」についての分析を通して、彼の神儒仏三教思想の成立原理を検討したものである。\n\n最初に、松宮観山の生涯、彼の提起した神儒仏三教思想及びそれにかかわる先行研究を概観する。次に、松宮観山の神儒仏三教思想における「道」と「教」との関わりについて論じる。『三教要論』の冒頭には「教えとは何ぞ、道を脩る也」とあり、この内容の出典は『中庸』の「天命之謂性、率性之謂道、脩道之謂教」と思われる。これをみれば、『中庸』の思想の影響を受けた観山は、「天→性→道→教」の順で「教」が最終的に生成すると主張した。また、観山の神儒仏三教思想は、「道」と「教」との関連を重視し、「教」は自然の「道」によって決定される。これを踏まえて、松宮観山の神儒仏三教思想の成立原理を分析していく。松宮観山は、荻生徂徠の「聖人の道」への執着を批判し、また、本居宣長が「大和心」を探求することを否定する。さらに、観山の独自的な神儒仏三教思想の構造を分析した。彼は「十二支」という概念の活用で、当時のインド、中国、日本の三者を比較し、日本の活力或いは生命力を誇りながら、神道の優位性を強調する。また易学の「天地人三才」の原理、すなわち宇宙間に存在する万物を統合する視点から、神・儒・仏という三つの教えを併用した。\n\nこのように、神道を中心として、儒仏の二教を補佐とする神儒仏三教思想が構築された。時代背景から見れば、中国では「明清交替」は本土や周辺に大きな影響を与えた。松宮観山の時代、「夷狄」であった満州人が政権を握っていた。同じく「夷狄」と見なされた朝鮮や日本などの周辺諸国において、国家意識や民族意識が次第に強くなっていた。観山においては、日本の「道」の独自性を強調するのが、それにあたると思われる。しかし、儒学を基盤とする中華文明から離れることができず、また日本においては、仏教の広範な社会的基礎があるので、このような時代背景からみれば、すでに日本の独自性に焦点を当てた観山は、神道だけを強調するのではなく、儒学と仏教を活用するように、保守的な態度をもって神儒仏三教思想を提起した。\n\n","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"This essay is an attempt to analyze the structure of Matsumiya Kanzan’s Shintoist Theory of Three Teachings, by studying the role of Tou (way or nature) and Kyou (teaching) in his theory.\n\nFirst, we take a look at Matsumiya’s life, his Theory of Three Teachings, and former research conducted on him. One of the proponents of a Three Teachings approach, Matsumiya lived in the Edo era and was an expert in military matters, Confucianism, surveying, poetry and the Chinese language. He advocated his main ideas in his book Sankyouyouron (‘The Basis of the Theory of Three Teachings’). Second, we focus on the connection between Tou and Kyou in Matsumiya’s ideology. In the beginning of The Basis of the Theory of Three Teachings he wrote, “What is the definition of Tou? It is the practice of Kyou.” The following sentence is taken from the Chinese classic Zhongyong (The Doctrine of Mean, trans. James Legge): “What heaven has conferred is called the Nature (Tou), an accordance with this Nature is the Path of duty (Sei), the regulation of this path is called Instruction (Kyou).” It seems that it was the influence of the Zhongyong that led Matsumiya to place Kyou last of his Three Teachings, in the order Tou-Sei-Kyou. Meanwhile, emphasizing the connection between Tou and Kyou, Matsumiya declared Kyou to be determined by Tou, which is based on the law of nature. This is the fundamental principle of his Theory of Three Teachings.\n\nMatsumiya criticized Ogyu Sorai’s theory for its insistence on defining Tou as the law of ancient sages, and also he disagreed with Motoori Norinaga’s Japan-centralist approach. Matsumiya applied the 12 earthly branch conception in comparing India, China and Japan, asserting the vitality of Japan, and emphasizing the excellence of Shintoism. He also applied the concept of the Three Geniuses (Heaven, Earth and Men), in order to advocate a position of everything being one when seen holistically, in order to support his combining teachings from different sources.\n\nThus, his construction of his Theory of the Three Teachings, which revolved mainly around Shintoism but also contained Confucian and Buddhist elements, was finally completed. In the period that Matsumiya lived, China was ruled by Qing Dynasty, formed of Manchus, who the people of the time termed “savages.” The fact that such “savages” had become the leaders of the East Asian world had great influence on China’s neighbouring nations, with Korea and Japan’s national consciousness gradually increased through their hatred of “savages.” Matsumiya’s emphasis on a Japanese form of Tou, different from the Chinese Tao, may be a product of increased national consciousness. However, Japan at this time had not separated itself from Confucianism-based Chinese culture, and Buddhism served as the basis of much of Japanese society, which means we can also see Matsumiya’s Theory of Three Teachings as motivated by a form of conservatism.","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_10002_link_26":{"attribute_name":"要旨リンク","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_link_text":"要旨","subitem_link_url":"http://www.bunka.soken.ac.jp/journal_bunka/14_03_song/index.html"},{"subitem_link_text":"Summary","subitem_link_url":"http://www.initiative.soken.ac.jp/journal_bunka/14_03_song/index_en.html"}]},"item_10002_link_28":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID(NCID)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_link_text":"AA12058987","subitem_link_url":"https://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/AA12058987"}]},"item_10002_publisher_8":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"総合研究大学院大学文化科学研究科 / 葉山町（神奈川県）"}]},"item_10002_relation_17":{"attribute_name":"関連サイト","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_relation_name":[{"subitem_relation_name_text":"第14号 号別論文一覧 / Vol.14 Contens"}],"subitem_relation_type_id":{"subitem_relation_type_id_text":"http://www.bunka.soken.ac.jp/journal_bunka/title_index.html#v14","subitem_relation_type_select":"URI"}}]},"item_10002_rights_15":{"attribute_name":"権利","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_rights":"© 2018 SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies)"}]},"item_10002_source_id_9":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"1883-096X","subitem_source_identifier_type":"ISSN"}]},"item_10002_textarea_25":{"attribute_name":"出版者(英)","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_textarea_language":"en","subitem_textarea_value":"SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies), School of Cultural and Social Studies"}]},"item_10002_version_type_20":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"宋, 琦","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]},{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"SONG, Qi","creatorNameLang":"en"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available"}],"filename":"SOKENDAIbunka_14_47","url":{"label":"論文PDF（リンク）","url":"http://www.initiative.soken.ac.jp/journal_bunka/14_03_song/song.pdf"},"version_id":""},{"accessrole":"open_date","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2018-03-26"}],"displaytype":"detail","filename":"song.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"3.2 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","licensetype":"license_5","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"label":"論文PDF","url":"https://ir.soken.ac.jp/record/5715/files/song.pdf"},"version_id":"87d0bb71-4b68-455b-9cb9-d8b907b2e408"}]},"item_keyword":{"attribute_name":"キーワード","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_subject":"松宮観山","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"神儒仏","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"三教思想","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"中庸","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"聖人の道","subitem_subject_language":"ja","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Matsumiya Kanzan","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Shintoism","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Buddhism and Confucianism","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"The Three-teaching ideology","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"Zhongyong","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"},{"subitem_subject":"The law of ancient sages","subitem_subject_language":"en","subitem_subject_scheme":"Other"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"松宮観山の思想における「道」と「教」　―神儒仏三教思想の成立原理についての一考察―","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"松宮観山の思想における「道」と「教」　―神儒仏三教思想の成立原理についての一考察―","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"The Tou and Kyou in Matsumiya Kanzan’s Theory: An Analysis of the Key Principle of His Theory of Three Teachings","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"10002","owner":"24","path":["502"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2018-03-26"},"publish_date":"2018-03-26","publish_status":"0","recid":"5715","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["松宮観山の思想における「道」と「教」　―神儒仏三教思想の成立原理についての一考察―"],"weko_creator_id":"24","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-01-24T02:17:12.939677+00:00"}