WEKO3
アイテム
{"_buckets": {"deposit": "500d056cff124e7c9bdb8aaed2cfd6bf"}, "_deposit": {"created_by": 1, "id": "686", "owners": [1], "pid": {"revision_id": 0, "type": "depid", "value": "686"}, "status": "published"}, "_oai": {"id": "oai:ir.soken.ac.jp:00000686", "sets": ["16"]}, "author_link": ["8932", "8931", "8930"], "item_1_biblio_info_21": {"attribute_name": "書誌情報（ソート用）", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"bibliographicIssueDates": {"bibliographicIssueDate": "20020322", "bibliographicIssueDateType": "Issued"}, "bibliographic_titles": [{}]}]}, "item_1_creator_2": {"attribute_name": "著者名", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "大鷲, 雄飛"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "8930", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_1_creator_3": {"attribute_name": "フリガナ", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "オオワシ, ユウヒ"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "8931", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_1_date_granted_11": {"attribute_name": "学位授与年月日", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_dategranted": "20020322"}]}, "item_1_degree_grantor_5": {"attribute_name": "学位授与機関", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_degreegrantor": [{"subitem_degreegrantor_name": "総合研究大学院大学"}]}]}, "item_1_degree_name_6": {"attribute_name": "学位名", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_degreename": "博士（理学）"}]}, "item_1_description_1": {"attribute_name": "ID", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "2002017", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_description_12": {"attribute_name": "要旨", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": " Today particle physics except for gravity is well described by the standard model. However, gravity cannot be quantized in the same method because we cannot renormalize it. Therefore the main problem of current particle physics is to establish a consistent quantum theory which contains both the standard model and gravity. Under these circumstances, the most hopeful and popular candidate is the string theory.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e The reason to favor the string theory is its wonderful nature. We can give as concrete examples that the theory has no ultraviolet divergence and includes gravitational field as well as matter and gauge fields automatically. However, due to the infinite ground states, this theory has no capability to predict; therefore we cannot answer why the standard model emerges. On the other hand it is possible to consider that this problem is the problem in the framework of perturbative formulation of the theory, because the completed region of the string theory is only the perturbative region. So if the nonperturbative formulation of the theory is accomplished, it is quite likely that this problem is resolved. Of course, it is pure speculation, but it seems quite probable that the nonperturbative effects turn infinite ground states into single one.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e What must not be forgotten is that one theory never finish before the nonperturbative formulation is completed. One of candidates for the nonperturbative formulation of the string theory at present is the string field theory. Although a considerable number of studies have been conducted on these theories, the only successful string field theories so far are the ones formulated in the lightcone gauge. So it is not clear whether we can extract some essential information of the nonperturbative effects. Another candidate is what is called the matrix model. With the advent of the BFSS model as a starter, many proposals have been being made since. The common idea of these models is that they reproduce sting or membrane theory in the largeN limit. In a sense the matrix model is similar to the lattice gauge theory, which is the nonperturbative formulation of the field theory, in that they can be analyzed using numerical simulation. Therefore it is reasonable to suppose that we will develop current matrix models a little further and find the true model.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e A virtue of the matrix model is that it has a possibility of putting an interpretation on the spacetime itself. However, some important questions such as \"what would be the real mechanism to realize the 4dimensional world from the 10(or 11)dimensional universe\" and \"how is the diffeomorphism introduced into the theory\" remain unsettled. One of them is the question of background independence. Consider the IKKT model for example. This model has an SO(10) × SU(N) symmetry, and this is just a symmetry like some theory was expanded around the flat background. Therefore we cannot deny the existence of different matrix model whose expansion around a special background gets the IKKT model. On this point Smolin proposed a new type of matrix model in which the action is cubic in matrices. Matrices are built from the super Lie algebra osp( 132; Ｒ), and one multiplet is pushed into a single supermatrix. Smolin\u0027s conjecture is that the expansions around different backgrounds of the osp(132; Ｒ) matrix model will reduce to the BFSS or IKKT model. However, as far as the IKKT model is concerned, the theory made from Smolin\u0027s way dose not reproduce the supersymmetry of the IKKT model. That is, indeed the 10dimensionality is realized, but the half of supersymmetry required by the IKKT model cannot be held. Anyway, the model described by a single matrix alone is very attractive, and Smolin\u0027s courageous attempt demonstrated one concrete possibility.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e Moreover, as Smolin\u0027s u(116, 16) model has demonstrated, the matrix models are not irrelevant to the loop quantum gravity which is another approach to the Theory of Everything. Furthermore, it was pointed out that the matrix string theory has a connection with the matrix model based on the exceptional Jordan algebra Ｊ, while B.Kim and A. Schwarz have discussed a tiein between the IKKT model and the Jordan algebra ｊ with its spinor representation. For these reasons, doing research on extended matrix model is very interesting and important. Over and above, we should not overlook the fact that several approaches which are very similar to the matrix model have been pursued by other fields. It might be inferred from these circumstantial evidence that the attempt to renounce the spacetime as a continuum holds one important key to the future progress of physics. It seems at least that there is no need to relate the matrix model to the string theory alone.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e For these purposes, we investigate new types of matrix models based on the complex exceptional Jordan algebra and the super Lie algebras. In the former case, a matrix ChernSimons theory is directly derived from the invariant on E\u003cSUB\u003e6\u003c/SUB\u003e. It is stated that the same argument as Smolin which derives an effective action similar to the matrix string theory can also be held in our model. The only difference is that our model has twice as many degrees of freedom as Smolin\u0027s model has. One way to introduce the cosmological term is the compactification on directions. It is of great interest that the properties of the product space Ｊ\u003cSUP\u003ec\u003c/SUP\u003e × ｇ, in which the degrees of freedom of our model live, are very similar to those of the physical Hilbert space. In the latter case, we investigate three super Lie algebras, osp(132;Ｒ), u(116,16), and gl(132;Ｒ). In paticular, we study the supersymmetry structures of these models and discuss possible reductions to the IKKT model. In addition to those, a different u(116, 16) model from Smolin\u0027s, and some kind of topological effective action derived using WignerIn\u0026ouml;n\u0026uuml; contraction are also discussed", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_description_18": {"attribute_name": "フォーマット", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "application/pdf", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_description_7": {"attribute_name": "学位記番号", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_description": "総研大甲第579号", "subitem_description_type": "Other"}]}, "item_1_select_14": {"attribute_name": "所蔵", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "有"}]}, "item_1_select_8": {"attribute_name": "研究科", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "数物科学研究科"}]}, "item_1_select_9": {"attribute_name": "専攻", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_select_item": "14 素粒子原子核専攻"}]}, "item_1_text_10": {"attribute_name": "学位授与年度", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "2001"}]}, "item_1_text_20": {"attribute_name": "業務メモ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_text_value": "（2018年2月13日）本籍など個人情報の記載がある旧要旨・審査要旨を個人情報のない新しいものに差し替えた。承諾書等未確認。要確認該当項目修正のこと。"}]}, "item_creator": {"attribute_name": "著者", "attribute_type": "creator", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"creatorNames": [{"creatorName": "OHWASHI, Yuhi", "creatorNameLang": "en"}], "nameIdentifiers": [{"nameIdentifier": "8932", "nameIdentifierScheme": "WEKO"}]}]}, "item_files": {"attribute_name": "ファイル情報", "attribute_type": "file", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "20160217"}], "displaytype": "simple", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 0, "filename": "甲579_要旨.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "345.6 kB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_11", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 345600.0, "url": {"label": "要旨・審査要旨 / Abstract, Screening Result", "url": "https://ir.soken.ac.jp/record/686/files/甲579_要旨.pdf"}, "version_id": "b3ad3cf4b5e84376a51a2655e39ebfae"}, {"accessrole": "open_date", "date": [{"dateType": "Available", "dateValue": "20160217"}], "displaytype": "simple", "download_preview_message": "", "file_order": 1, "filename": "甲579_本文.pdf", "filesize": [{"value": "1.9 MB"}], "format": "application/pdf", "future_date_message": "", "is_thumbnail": false, "licensetype": "license_11", "mimetype": "application/pdf", "size": 1900000.0, "url": {"label": "本文", "url": "https://ir.soken.ac.jp/record/686/files/甲579_本文.pdf"}, "version_id": "f735d2e84968412e8c430f9892e2da56"}]}, "item_language": {"attribute_name": "言語", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_language": "eng"}]}, "item_resource_type": {"attribute_name": "資源タイプ", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"resourcetype": "thesis", "resourceuri": "http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec"}]}, "item_title": "New Types of Matrix Models", "item_titles": {"attribute_name": "タイトル", "attribute_value_mlt": [{"subitem_title": "New Types of Matrix Models"}, {"subitem_title": "New Types of Matrix Models", "subitem_title_language": "en"}]}, "item_type_id": "1", "owner": "1", "path": ["16"], "permalink_uri": "https://ir.soken.ac.jp/records/686", "pubdate": {"attribute_name": "公開日", "attribute_value": "20100222"}, "publish_date": "20100222", "publish_status": "0", "recid": "686", "relation": {}, "relation_version_is_last": true, "title": ["New Types of Matrix Models"], "weko_shared_id": 1}
New Types of Matrix Models
https://ir.soken.ac.jp/records/686
https://ir.soken.ac.jp/records/6862f2f476f3f4d4cf2963a7c4de6d04cc0
名前 / ファイル  ライセンス  アクション 

要旨・審査要旨 / Abstract, Screening Result (345.6 kB)


本文 (1.9 MB)

Item type  学位論文 / Thesis or Dissertation(1)  

公開日  20100222  
タイトル  
タイトル  New Types of Matrix Models  
タイトル  
言語  en  
タイトル  New Types of Matrix Models  
言語  
言語  eng  
資源タイプ  
資源タイプ識別子  http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_46ec  
資源タイプ  thesis  
著者名 
大鷲, 雄飛
× 大鷲, 雄飛 

フリガナ 
オオワシ, ユウヒ
× オオワシ, ユウヒ 

著者 
OHWASHI, Yuhi
× OHWASHI, Yuhi 

学位授与機関  
学位授与機関名  総合研究大学院大学  
学位名  
学位名  博士（理学）  
学位記番号  
内容記述タイプ  Other  
内容記述  総研大甲第579号  
研究科  
値  数物科学研究科  
専攻  
値  14 素粒子原子核専攻  
学位授与年月日  
学位授与年月日  20020322  
学位授与年度  
2001  
要旨  
内容記述タイプ  Other  
内容記述  Today particle physics except for gravity is well described by the standard model. However, gravity cannot be quantized in the same method because we cannot renormalize it. Therefore the main problem of current particle physics is to establish a consistent quantum theory which contains both the standard model and gravity. Under these circumstances, the most hopeful and popular candidate is the string theory.<br /><br /> The reason to favor the string theory is its wonderful nature. We can give as concrete examples that the theory has no ultraviolet divergence and includes gravitational field as well as matter and gauge fields automatically. However, due to the infinite ground states, this theory has no capability to predict; therefore we cannot answer why the standard model emerges. On the other hand it is possible to consider that this problem is the problem in the framework of perturbative formulation of the theory, because the completed region of the string theory is only the perturbative region. So if the nonperturbative formulation of the theory is accomplished, it is quite likely that this problem is resolved. Of course, it is pure speculation, but it seems quite probable that the nonperturbative effects turn infinite ground states into single one.<br /><br /> What must not be forgotten is that one theory never finish before the nonperturbative formulation is completed. One of candidates for the nonperturbative formulation of the string theory at present is the string field theory. Although a considerable number of studies have been conducted on these theories, the only successful string field theories so far are the ones formulated in the lightcone gauge. So it is not clear whether we can extract some essential information of the nonperturbative effects. Another candidate is what is called the matrix model. With the advent of the BFSS model as a starter, many proposals have been being made since. The common idea of these models is that they reproduce sting or membrane theory in the largeN limit. In a sense the matrix model is similar to the lattice gauge theory, which is the nonperturbative formulation of the field theory, in that they can be analyzed using numerical simulation. Therefore it is reasonable to suppose that we will develop current matrix models a little further and find the true model.<br /><br /> A virtue of the matrix model is that it has a possibility of putting an interpretation on the spacetime itself. However, some important questions such as "what would be the real mechanism to realize the 4dimensional world from the 10(or 11)dimensional universe" and "how is the diffeomorphism introduced into the theory" remain unsettled. One of them is the question of background independence. Consider the IKKT model for example. This model has an SO(10) × SU(N) symmetry, and this is just a symmetry like some theory was expanded around the flat background. Therefore we cannot deny the existence of different matrix model whose expansion around a special background gets the IKKT model. On this point Smolin proposed a new type of matrix model in which the action is cubic in matrices. Matrices are built from the super Lie algebra osp( 132; Ｒ), and one multiplet is pushed into a single supermatrix. Smolin's conjecture is that the expansions around different backgrounds of the osp(132; Ｒ) matrix model will reduce to the BFSS or IKKT model. However, as far as the IKKT model is concerned, the theory made from Smolin's way dose not reproduce the supersymmetry of the IKKT model. That is, indeed the 10dimensionality is realized, but the half of supersymmetry required by the IKKT model cannot be held. Anyway, the model described by a single matrix alone is very attractive, and Smolin's courageous attempt demonstrated one concrete possibility.<br /><br /> Moreover, as Smolin's u(116, 16) model has demonstrated, the matrix models are not irrelevant to the loop quantum gravity which is another approach to the Theory of Everything. Furthermore, it was pointed out that the matrix string theory has a connection with the matrix model based on the exceptional Jordan algebra Ｊ, while B.Kim and A. Schwarz have discussed a tiein between the IKKT model and the Jordan algebra ｊ with its spinor representation. For these reasons, doing research on extended matrix model is very interesting and important. Over and above, we should not overlook the fact that several approaches which are very similar to the matrix model have been pursued by other fields. It might be inferred from these circumstantial evidence that the attempt to renounce the spacetime as a continuum holds one important key to the future progress of physics. It seems at least that there is no need to relate the matrix model to the string theory alone.<br /><br /> For these purposes, we investigate new types of matrix models based on the complex exceptional Jordan algebra and the super Lie algebras. In the former case, a matrix ChernSimons theory is directly derived from the invariant on E<SUB>6</SUB>. It is stated that the same argument as Smolin which derives an effective action similar to the matrix string theory can also be held in our model. The only difference is that our model has twice as many degrees of freedom as Smolin's model has. One way to introduce the cosmological term is the compactification on directions. It is of great interest that the properties of the product space Ｊ<SUP>c</SUP> × ｇ, in which the degrees of freedom of our model live, are very similar to those of the physical Hilbert space. In the latter case, we investigate three super Lie algebras, osp(132;Ｒ), u(116,16), and gl(132;Ｒ). In paticular, we study the supersymmetry structures of these models and discuss possible reductions to the IKKT model. In addition to those, a different u(116, 16) model from Smolin's, and some kind of topological effective action derived using WignerInönü contraction are also discussed  
所蔵  
値  有  
フォーマット  
内容記述タイプ  Other  
内容記述  application/pdf 